E. Nava
To Win
J. Schwaerzler
To Win
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W W W W W W W W W LForm
W W W L W W L W W LThey have played 4 sets in total, with Nava winning 4 and Gaio winning 0. The last match between Nava and Gaio was at the Stanford Challenger, 15-08-2023, Second, Hard with Emilio Nava getting the victory 6-4 6-4.
Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Emilio Nava | 2 |
Federico Gaio | 0 |
Stanford Challenger(15-08-2023)
Nava | Stats | Gaio |
---|---|---|
76% (31-10) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
2 | Head-to-Head | 0 |
132 | Ranking | 741 |
124 | Highest Rank | 124 |
23 | Age | 33 |
R | Plays | R |
6 | Titles | 13 |
60% (219-147) | Career Total W/L | 55% (526-439) |
$442,385 | Career Prize Money | $392,005 |
3 | YTD Titles | 0 |
2 | Hard H2H | 0 |
22 Apr 2025 / First
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
22 Apr 2025 / Q3
Mutua Madrid Open - Madrid atp
23 Apr 2025 / First
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-4 6-4 |
![]() ![]()
Emilio Nava
Player
Federico Gaio
80%
(
39 of
49)
1st Serve %
60%
(
34 of
57)
5
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
7
85%
(
33 of
39)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
24 of
34)
70%
(
7 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
13 of
23)
67%
(
2 of
3)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
18%
(
9 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
20 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
46
|
||||
6-3 6-2 |
![]() ![]()
Emilio Nava
Player
Federico Gaio
57%
(
32 of
56)
1st Serve %
59%
(
26 of
44)
6
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
27 of
32)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
17 of
26)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
9 of
18)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
15 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
18 of
44)
59
Total Points Won
41
|
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
2 | H2H Matches | 0 |
4 | Sets Won | 0 |
24 | Games Won | 13 |
11 | Aces (Total) | 4 |
0 | Total Double Faults | 9 |
1:4:42 | Average Match Time | 1:4:42 |
68% (71/105) | 1st Serve % | 59% (60/101) |
85% (60/71) | 1st Serve Win % | 68% (41/60) |
62% (21/34) | 2nd Serve Win % | 54% (22/41) |
56% (5/9) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 0% (0/6) |
38% (38/101) | Return Points Win % | 23% (24/105) |
100% (2/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 0% (0/2) |
0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/0) |
100% (2/2) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (2/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (2/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
QF |
![]() ![]()
Lilian Marmousez
Player
Federico Gaio
63%
(
52 of
83)
1st Serve %
51%
(
39 of
76)
5
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
4
71%
(
37 of
52)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
29 of
39)
65%
(
20 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
21 of
37)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
26 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
26 of
76)
83
Total Points Won
76
|
7-6(5) 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Gaio
Player
Gabriele Bosio
77%
(
47 of
61)
1st Serve %
88%
(
53 of
60)
6
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
3
72%
(
34 of
47)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
43%
(
6 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
29%
(
4 of
14)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
21 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Gaio
Player
Gianluca Carlini
44%
(
19 of
43)
1st Serve %
69%
(
42 of
61)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
5
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
83%
(
20 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
16%
(
7 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Arnaboldi
Player
Federico Gaio
44%
(
40 of
91)
1st Serve %
55%
(
57 of
103)
2
Aces
3
8
Double Faults
5
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
37 of
57)
57%
(
29 of
51)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
37%
(
34 of
91)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
46 of
103)
103
Total Points Won
91
|
7-5 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Gaio
Player
Filippo Romano
56%
(
44 of
79)
1st Serve %
57%
(
61 of
107)
4
Aces
2
6
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
38 of
61)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
20 of
46)
44%
(
7 of
16)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
79)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
49 of
107)
103
Total Points Won
83
|
6-1 6-7(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Gaio
Player
Alessandro Dragoni
49%
(
26 of
53)
1st Serve %
53%
(
31 of
59)
9
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
9
88%
(
23 of
26)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
21 of
31)
56%
(
15 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
9 of
28)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
28%
(
15 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
![]() ![]()
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Federico Gaio
48%
(
32 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
40 of
71)
4
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
6
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
68%
(
23 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
17 of
31)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
26%
(
17 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
25 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Gaio
Player
Egor Gerasimov
59%
(
46 of
78)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
83)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
10
78%
(
36 of
46)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
34 of
46)
53%
(
17 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
18 of
37)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
32%
(
25 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
84
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
QF |
![]() ![]()
Federico Gaio
Player
Joao Eduardo Schiessl
68%
(
70 of
103)
1st Serve %
61%
(
51 of
83)
4
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
34 of
51)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
18 of
32)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
43%
(
44 of
103)
Rtn Points Won
37%
(
31 of
83)
90
Total Points Won
96
|
7-6(5) 1-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
![]() ![]()
Federico Gaio
Player
Blake Mott
52%
(
32 of
61)
1st Serve %
77%
(
50 of
65)
4
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
30 of
50)
38%
(
11 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
43%
(
3 of
7)
39%
(
24 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
31 of
65)
68
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
60% (219/147) | Win/Loss | 55% (526/439) |
56% (486/375) | Sets Win/Loss | 53% (1205/1068) |
52% (4358/4048) | Games Win/Loss | 51% (11068/10593) |
55% (89/73) | Hard Win/Loss | 55% (136/111) |
68% (100/46) | Clay Win/Loss | 57% (334/256) |
55% (28/23) | Indoor Hard W/L | 45% (51/63) |
29% (2/5) | Grass Win/Loss | 36% (5/9) |
0.52 | Aces Per Game | 0.28 |
2137 | Aces Total | 3004 |
0.25 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.23 |
1037 | Total Double Faults | 2390 |
1:36:41 | Average Match Time | 1:9:27 |
370.66 | Average Opponent Rank | 556.31 |
63% (15798/25259) | 1st Serve % | 58% (27135/47153) |
71% (11201/15798) | 1st Serve Win % | 71% (19324/27135) |
51% (4871/9461) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (10139/20018) |
42% (941/2248) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 39% (1750/4458) |
38% (9584/25310) | Return Points Win % | 38% (18415/48497) |
55% (12/10) | Slam W/L | 32% (12/26) |
40% (8/12) | Masters W/L | 23% (3/10) |
0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
43% (9/12) | Main Tour W/L | 40% (21/31) |
0% (0/0) | Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) |
62% (142/87) | Challenger W/L | 51% (270/257) |
65% (48/26) | Futures W/L | 66% (220/115) |
60% (214/357) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 54% (515/949) |
43% (3/7) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 67% (6/9) |
48% (76/157) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 46% (141/309) |
61% (74/121) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (183/340) |
86% (204/176) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (511/435) |
14% (204/28) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (511/76) |
26% (162/42) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 20% (454/90) |